<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cbl.us/2005/12/13/aperture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cbl.us/2005/12/13/aperture/</link>
	<description>Just a few random things about cbl</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:40:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cbl</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbl.us/2005/12/13/aperture/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>cbl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbl.us/archives/84#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only thrown a few RAW at it. From what I can tell it&#039;s fine.  If you&#039;ve read the review that was linked on /. you might get turned off to Aperture.  Yes, it&#039;s still a 1.0 app, but it does what it does better than Canon RAW editor, iPhoto, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only thrown a few RAW at it. From what I can tell it&#8217;s fine.  If you&#8217;ve read the review that was linked on /. you might get turned off to Aperture.  Yes, it&#8217;s still a 1.0 app, but it does what it does better than Canon RAW editor, iPhoto, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbl.us/2005/12/13/aperture/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbl.us/archives/84#comment-14</guid>
		<description>What are you impressions of its handling of RAW images?  I&#039;ve read many complaints that it is &quot;lacking&quot; in that area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you impressions of its handling of RAW images?  I&#8217;ve read many complaints that it is &#8220;lacking&#8221; in that area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

